Security programmes in export manufacturing serve two masters: preventing loss and satisfying supply chain security audits such as C-TPAT and buyer-specific standards. The two overlap substantially, and designing for both at once is far cheaper than retrofitting audit evidence onto an informal system.
Layered control, from the fence inward
- Perimeter. Continuous barrier, controlled vehicle and pedestrian gates, lighting at gates and along the fence line, and clear sight lines — no stored material against the inside of the fence, which is the most common finding on a first audit.
- Building envelope. Controlled and monitored external doors, secured windows at ground level, roof access locked.
- Internal zones. Differential access for finished goods, the shipping dock, IT rooms and the chemical store. A single badge that opens everything defeats the point of having badges.
- Asset level. Locked cages for high-value trim, controlled issue of labels and packaging carrying the brand.
Brand labels and packaging deserve specific mention: for many buyers, controlled destruction of rejected labels with a documented log is a hard requirement, because unaccounted labels are the raw material for counterfeit goods.
Visitor management that people will actually follow
A process that takes fifteen minutes per visitor will be bypassed by the first manager in a hurry. Keep it to four steps:
- Pre-registration by the host, with name, company, purpose and expected time. This removes the queue at the gate.
- Identity verification against photo ID at arrival, with the ID number recorded rather than the document retained.
- Badge issue — visibly different from employee badges, colour-coded by zone, numbered and returned on exit. Reconcile issued against returned at the end of every day; an unreturned badge is an incident, not an inconvenience.
- Escort rules stated on the badge itself. Contractors working unescorted need a separate category with a documented approval and an induction record.
The evidence auditors ask for
| Requirement | Evidence expected |
|---|---|
| Documented security procedure | Signed policy, current revision, distribution record |
| Employee screening | Pre-employment verification records, consistently applied |
| Visitor control | Complete log, badge reconciliation, escort records |
| Container or trailer inspection | Seven-point inspection checklist, signed, per shipment |
| Seal control | ISO 17712 high-security seals, numbered log, restricted custody |
| CCTV | Coverage plan, retention period (commonly 30-90 days), review log |
| Incident response | Reported incidents with investigation and corrective action |
| Training | Attendance records, content, refresh frequency |
The seven-point container inspection — front wall, left side, right side, floor, ceiling, inside and outside doors, outside and undercarriage — is a specific, checkable procedure. Auditors ask to see completed checklists for recent shipments, and a blank pad of forms is worse than none.
Seal control is where programmes fail
High-security seals must be stored in a locked location with restricted access, issued against a numbered log, and the number recorded on the shipping documents and communicated to the consignee independently of the container. A box of seals in an unlocked desk drawer at the shipping office is a finding on any audit and a genuine vulnerability.
CCTV policy, not just cameras
Cameras without a written policy generate liability without generating security. Define coverage — gates, docks, finished goods, cash handling — the retention period, who may review footage and under what circumstance, and how privacy in welfare areas is respected. Verify recording actually works monthly; a surprising proportion of installed systems are found to have been overwriting or offline for months.
The quarterly self-audit
Run your own audit against the buyer's checklist every quarter, with a written report and corrective actions. The organisations that pass external audits comfortably are not the ones with the most equipment; they are the ones whose records show a consistent internal cycle of finding and fixing their own gaps.

Discussion0
Sign in to join the discussion.