Skip to content
Apparel DiaryApparel Diary

Fabric consumption per garment calculator

Fabric needed per garment and per dozen from a marker, with shrinkage and wastage allowances that are stated rather than hidden in a single fudge factor.

Results update as you type.

Inputs

Length of one marker lay, from the CAD marker report.

Complete garments (all pattern pieces) nested in the marker.

End loss, splicing, fabric faults. Added on top of net consumption.

Only if the marker is not already graded for it (e.g. garment wash). 0 otherwise.

0 to skip the weight result.

0 to skip the weight result.

Result

Fabric per garment

1.545m

Including shrinkage and wastage

Per dozen

18.54m/dz

Per garment in yards

1.69yd

Net (marker ÷ garments)

1.5m

How this is calculated

net = marker length ÷ garments per marker. Shrinkage that happens after cutting is compensated by dividing: with shrinkage = net ÷ (1 − shrinkage%), because a panel that must measure L after an s% shrink has to be cut at L ÷ (1 − s). Wastage is then added: total = with shrinkage × (1 + wastage%). Weight per garment, if width and GSM are given, is total × width × GSM.

Worked example. A 6.0 m marker holds 4 garments: net 1.5 m. With 3% wastage and no shrinkage: 1.5 × 1.03 = 1.545 m per garment (18.54 m per dozen). With 3% shrinkage as well: 1.5 ÷ 0.97 × 1.03 = 1.593 m.

Questions

Why use the marker rather than the pattern area?
The marker already includes the gaps between pattern pieces - its efficiency - which a pattern-area calculation has to guess. If you have a CAD marker, its length per garment is the most reliable consumption you can get before cutting.
When should I enter shrinkage?
Only when the marker has been made to the finished dimensions and the fabric will shrink afterwards, for example in a garment wash. If the pattern has already been graded up for shrinkage, enter 0 or you will count it twice.
What does the wastage allowance cover?
Losses the marker does not show: end loss at each end of the lay, splicing, fabric faults cut out, and short ends. 2-5% is common; use your own cutting-room records.

Sources & verification

The marker method and the allowance structure follow standard cutting-room and garment-costing practice; the shrinkage compensation is the algebra of the ISO 3759 / ISO 5077 dimensional-change definition. The worked example is recomputed in the automated tests.